For patients with cervical radiculopathy, total disc replacement using artificial disc devices that have become more widely used during the last 10 years presents a potential advance in treatment. It may preserve range-of-motion and decrease the need for later secondary surgery when compared to the standard anterior discectomy and spinal fusion. “Artificial disc devices can yield good results in the right patients,” notes Mark Knaub, MD, assistant professor and associate director of the Penn State Spine Center. However, Dr. Knaub explains that there are significant limitations to their usefulness: “These devices are not appropriate to use in patients with poor bone quality or disc disease affecting multiple levels, nor for patients with a pre-existing fusion, those who present with significant arthritis and those with already limited range-of-motion.” While clinical trials show improvement of symptoms with disc arthroplasty,1,2 there is controversy regarding whether a cervical disc arthroplasty can reduce the frequency of reoperations, compared with fusion.
Tag Archives: Penn State Bone and Joint Institute
When patients need to return to what they consider to be their “normal life” and activity following orthopaedic injuries or surgery, there is little evidence-based guidelines for such assessment.
Despite potentially impactful financial, medical and legal implications of such decisions, little is standardized to help assist orthopaedists make safe recommendations. Kenneth Taylor, MD, associate professor and chief, hand surgery, Bone and Joint Institute, says, “Orthopaedists routinely make decisions about what activities a patient can safely engage in after an injury or surgery. Questions come up about when he or she can drive, go back to work or return to team sports.” He notes, “Part of the problem is the issue is incredibly broad. It occurs across various orthopaedic issues and touches on many different activities.” In most cases, these decisions involve patients with an upper or lower extremity that has undergone repair; activities include important areas of functioning like driving, work and school. In response, Dr. Taylor is currently developing a research protocol to identify factors that reliably predict a patient’s readiness to return to driving, an issue that impacts nearly all adult patients in the orthopaedic clinic setting. Continue reading
Measurement of Tibial Tubercle to Trochlear Groove (TT-TG) Distance by MRI for Patellofemoral Instability
Patellar instability, with repeated lateral dislocation, commonly seen in younger, active adults, is associated with a number of anatomical pathologies and usually requires surgical intervention. Among these, increased tibial tubercle to trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is a prominent risk factor. TT-TG distance describes the degree of lateralization of the tibial tubercle. “TT-TG distance is routinely measured in most patients who present with a partial or complete knee-cap dislocation. This makes it an accessible piece of information that could potentially be used to identify patients at-risk for repeated dislocations,” explains Paul Sherbondy, M.D., Bone and Joint Institute.
Novel Pin Array Guide Boosts Accuracy of Glenoid Component Positioning in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Achieving accurate glenoid component placement during total shoulder arthroplasty is one of the most challenging aspects of the procedure. In most cases, there is substantial arthritis-related bone deformity with limited exposure of the glenoid surface intra-operatively, making it difficult to visualize. April D. Armstrong, M.D., chief, shoulder and elbow surgery, Bone and Joint Institute, says, “When the glenoid component isn’t accurately placed, it tends to loosen and eventually requires a revision procedure.” Using traditional placement techniques in one investigation, errors in version and inclination of the central drill line, on average, were approximately 9 degrees and version error correlated with the degree of arthritic glenoid version.¹ Continue reading
One of the most challenging scenarios is the patient with a complex hindfoot deformity involving both the ankle and the subtalar joint. “Hindfoot deformities involve complex anatomy, and may be caused by trauma, arthritis, congenital disease or may be related to Charcot neuropathy,” explains Paul J. Juliano, M.D., chief, foot and ankle orthopaedics, Bone and Joint Institute. Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis, often paired with osteotomy, is a salvage procedure typically performed in patients with severe tibiotalar and subtalar arthropathy with a significant pre-operative deformity. Over the past 10 to 15 years, treatment has shifted away from external fixation to internal fusion achieved with an intra-medullary nail.1,2 Continue reading
With increasing costs for spine treatments and more push-back from insurance companies questioning effectiveness, safety and value, cost containment strategies have become a major factor influencing spine treatment choices for patients.¹ Currently, a large part of the value equation includes process of care measures and direct costs associated with devices, surgery and length-of-stay. Jesse Bible, M.D., assistant professor and orthopaedic spine surgeon, Bone and Joint Institute, predicts a potential shift toward a broader, patient outcomes-driven value equation within the next five years. Continue reading
Acute treatment decision-making for patients with multiple traumatic injuries including a mangled extremity is guided by the adage, “life before limb.” Non-life-threatening injuries limited to a single extremity, like the hand, pose a difficult dilemma; choosing preservation over amputation is not always the best approach for every patient. “Injuries limited to the hand are usually a result of operating machinery at work, around the home or farm, or firework-related accidents,” says Kenneth Taylor, M.D., Bone and Joint Institute, hand reconstruction specialist.
Dr. Taylor frequently attempts to stabilize the injury before deciding to preserve or amputate. “Patients are often in shock and a great deal of pain,” he explains. “Their decision may evolve over time, during or after acute care. Patients also need time to trust me personally, to listen to the information I’m sharing with them about what lies ahead during recovery.” Dr. Taylor firmly stresses, “The decision is highly personal and individual. What is possible surgically to preserve the hand is not always what is personally right for the patient.” Continue reading